SPONSORCHAT
Adult Webmaster Forum And Resources - Established 2004

WELCOME TO SPONSORCHAT CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE BOARD

Go Back   SponsorChat - Adult Webmaster Board > MAINCHAT
User Name
Password
Register Blog Directory Contact Banners Advertise FAQ Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2017, 01:38 PM   #1
CashMike
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 216
CashMike 1
Default Federal judge stops Obama's trans decision

Bad news for trans people, the judge in question said no to Obama.

Quote:
Federal Judge Puts Stop to Obama’s Rank Transgender Power Grab

By Bill Donohue | January 4, 2017 | 8:59 AM EST






http://www.cnsnews.com/s3/files/sty...g?itok=hUYP7ex7President Barack Hussein Obama (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

If the Obama administration had its way, the new year would have begun with a dramatic loss of religious liberty and an equally dramatic bastardization of existing law. Instead, U.S. District Court Judge Reed O'Connor issued a preliminary injunction on New Year's Eve stopping the Obama administration from denying the right of Catholic institutions to live by their religious tenets.

Texas, and other states, along with the Franciscan Alliance, and other religious entities, sued the federal government for violating basic religious rights. Judge O'Connor ruled that the Obama administration's regulation barring discrimination on the basis of "gender identity" could not be enforced. The defendants also sought to force Catholic institutions to perform, and pay for, abortions.

Joining the Franciscan Alliance as a plaintiff was the Christian Medical & Dental Society; the former was founded by the Sisters of St. Francis of Perpetual Adoration, and the latter is the nation's largest faith-based organization of doctors. Even the Obama administration did not quarrel with their central complaint: the regulation meant that their religious-based objections to gender transitions and abortions would no longer be honored.

Think about what President Obama tried to do. To begin with, he sought to force religious organizations to perform an operation whereby a man acquires the body parts of a female, and vice versa. Second, these same organizations would be required to kill babies in the womb. If they did not agree, they would, in effect, be shut down; all federal funds would be cut.

The Obama lawyers had to be told by a federal judge that they had no right to dismiss the Administrative Procedure Act; it does not permit attempts to contradict existing law and efforts to exceed statutory authority. They were also schooled on the meaning of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a law signed by President Bill Clinton making it difficult for the government to override religious liberties.

In a move that can only be called devious, the Obama team attempted to put a new spin on Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments: the new regulation, Section 1557, invoked those provisions to mean that it is discriminatory to deny gender transition operations. But in 1972, sex discrimination simply meant that it was unconstitutional to discriminate against a man or a woman, as determined by their sex at birth. It said nothing, and implied nothing, about guys switching genitals.



Obama's Health and Human Services admitted that if it got its way, some procedures “related to gender transition” may be required even if not “strictly identified as medically necessary or appropriate.” Which means that if Bruce Jenner elected to finish the job—he still has male genitalia downstairs—Catholic institutions would have to pay for it.

Never satisfied to shove secular ideology down the throats of the faithful, the Obama regulation promotes a new form of discrimination, one that bars discrimination on the basis of “termination of pregnancy.” Thus did the administration summarily ignore the plain language of the religious and abortion exemptions provided by Title IX.

The Obama attorneys exhibited a very selective interest in Title IX. Previous court rulings have made it clear that Title IX does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of transgender itself; transgender is not a protected characteristic under the statute.

Where did Obama's attorneys think they got all these new rights? As Judge O'Connor pointed out, it wasn't from the Supreme Court: he explicitly said that when it comes to the Congress delegating sweeping powers to an administrative agency, it “has emphasized a common-sense approach.”

That, of course, is the problem. The Obama staffers have no common sense. Moreover, this was a rank power grab.

Only deep thinkers void of common sense would maintain that it is normal for a guy to protest his manhood, or for a gal to acquire the anatomy of a man. It is meanness, not a lack of common sense, that explains why these same operatives seek to coerce faith-based institutions into performing and funding this abnormal feat. It is even worse to make them sponsor child abuse in the womb.

Obama's fixation on abortion rights and transgender rights is at one with his animus against religious liberty. Thank God he lost this round. Soon he won't be able to do any more damage. Hallelujah!

Bill Donohue is President and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization. He was awarded his Ph.D. in sociology from New York University and is the author of seven books and many articles.





http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/b...nder-power-grab

Ads
CashMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 08:34 AM   #2
SMUTman
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 280
SMUTman 1
Default

Give it time just as the gay rights movement won the transexuals will get their day of equality.
__________________
TGP man Chris is here
SMUTman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2017, 02:01 PM   #3
Moody
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 37
Moody 1
Default

Republican president elect, and Congress, I see nothing positive going to happen for trans-genders in the next 4 years.

Ads
Moody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2017, 10:02 AM   #4
Bromack
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 746
Bromack 1
Default

Just wait until January 21st, Trump and Congress are going to overturn a lot of his doings.
__________________
Get back to work stop looking here
Bromack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2017, 10:56 AM   #5
Alf
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 32
Alf 1
Default

This sucks for transsexuals every where

Ads
Alf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2017, 10:13 PM   #6
KY
Email henrykev27@yahoo.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,203
KY 1
Send a message via ICQ to KY
Default

Not surprised
__________________
Ron Paul 2016
KY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2017, 10:11 AM   #7
DeSexGuide
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 601
DeSexGuide 1
Default

Waiting to see who gets the open seat at the supreme court, if it's a conservative type judge then more trouble for lgbtq peeps.

Ads
DeSexGuide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2017, 12:01 PM   #8
Gspotman
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 989
Gspotman 1
Default

A lot more of his executive orders will be changing once The Donald takes charge.
__________________
It's all about the G-SPOT
Gspotman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2017, 12:35 PM   #9
New.Art
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 140
New.Art 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gspotman
A lot more of his executive orders will be changing once The Donald takes charge.
Some might be for the good others not so, we'll see over time.

Ads
New.Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2017, 08:48 AM   #10
ZR1Sam
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 398
ZR1Sam 1
Default

President Trump is going to be making a lot of changes to Obama's executive orders and laws, so judges will be involved more this coming year.

Ads
ZR1Sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump




Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2017 SponsorChat.com
Hosted by ISPrime